"We All Felt That There Is More To This Than We Know"

That was a line from the Dan Stamper interview on WJR radio yesterday. It was a very tough one, the strongest I have heard Dan Stamper give. You can hear it by double-clicking on the screen below.

There is no doubt that there was a tone of anger and frustration in his voice and in what he said. It must mean that the Bridge Company has found something out that has troubled them considerably. Here is the classic line that he used in the interview that is shocking with the poor state of the economy in Michigan and in our region that expresses exactly what I mean:

• "It should not be this hard to spend a billion private dollars in the State of Michigan with the problems that are going on in the State of Michigan today."

He made some very serious allegations about what is going on in the border crossing matter that I think some people will find pretty startling. I must admit that it confirms my own "theories" that there is a plan designed to force the Ambassador Bridge out of business so that Governments can take over the running of the Windsor Detroit corridor, or rather take over ownership of the crossing and then lease it to a private operator for up to 100 years.

Stamper talks about the Budget fight in Michigan. He goes right after the Governor, MDOT and its Director. He claims that they have said that the Ambassador Bridge project is the best project but for Canada saying that they will not allow it to land in Windsor. Stamper states that Canada has never been quoted in saying that anywhere. He states that Transport Canada said everything but that in their meeting in Ottawa last week. Their position was that if the EA is correct Canada will not stop them from building their bridge!

He wonders why Michigan is "blaming Canada!"

Possible competition between MDOT and the Bridge Co. at the Blue Water Bridge Sarnia is given as a reason as to what is happening in Detroit. It is very similar to what is happening in Windsor where we have our Local Government as a competitor of the private operator. More information is given about the Enhancement Project and its advantages while discussing MDOT's failures at the border crossing at Sarnia/Port Huron. A new Plaza has to be built there at a cost about $450 million to correct the mistakes made. There is a discussion about the role of private enterprise and that private enterprise will do a better job than governments in these types of projects.

The most interestingly part is the seeming warming in relations between Canada and the Bridge Co. Can you believe it! The meeting in Canada must have gone very well with assurances apparently being given that the Government will treat the Bridge Co. fairly in the EA process here. Stamper accuses Michigan of mis-stating Canada's position!

If Stamper is right, and if the lies about the Plaza in Canada are recognized, then the Enhancement Project bridge is the #1 choice for both sides of the river. All that needs to be done then is build the road to that bridge. And Windsor and DRIC have followed now the course set by the Bridge Co. 5 years ago in how to build a road for trucks and how to connect communities!

Listen for yourself below by doubleclicking!

Michigan Senate Resolution

If you don't think that some Legislators have finally understood what is going on, then take a look at the Resolution that was passed last night by the Senate of Michigan concerning the border and the Ambassador Bridge Enhancement Project. When you read the wording of the Resolution, how could anyone possibly oppose it?

If only our elected officials in Canada at all levels would have this much sense.

I'll let you read it for yourself so that you can make your own interpretation of it. From what the newspapers have said as well, it looks like DRIC will only be given enough funds to complete their report and that's it. When I get a copy of the budget language, I shall post it.

Let's get real now. Given the Senate's language does anyone truly believe that a DRIC bridge can ever be built now.

Given the theorist that I am about the border, I cannot help but think that Transport Canada must have had an inkling about what might happen with the budget talks in Michigan. The timing of the meeting with the Bridge Company is remarkably coincidental.

Was Transport Canada hedging its bets? They appeared to be so cooperative with the Bridge Company based on what Dan Stamper said in his WJR interview.

If DRIC was allowed to continue, then Transport Canada would have been pleased. If DRIC was killed, it would be a calamity for Canada's trade with the United States and Transport Canada needed a backup. Their only backup realistically in southwest Ontario, since the Blue Water Bridge is such a mess, is the Bridge Company building their Enhancement Project. After all, the facts are that the Ambassador Bridge is the biggest land crossing between Canada and the United States by far and the best run as well.

There is just too much going on behind the scenes for anybody to try to figure out what is really happening. However, we seem to be coming to a climax pretty soon.

All I know is that the options are being eliminated. I believe that Transport Canada has finally figured out that they better be a player with the Ambassador Bridge Company or will be ignored as happened with the City of Windsor.

As well, there is a news report in Michigan that Senator "Cropsey also asserted that as part of the deal Gov. Jennifer Granholm expressed her support for the twinning of the Ambassador Bridge."

Now if we could only get that damned road to the Ambassador Bridge built, thousands of jobs created and some economic development for this region!

• Senators Cropsey, Bishop and Hardiman offered the following resolution:
  
  Senate Resolution No. 123.
  
  A resolution to support the plan of the Detroit International Bridge Company to establish an enhancement span to the Ambassador Bridge and to urge the Michigan Strategic Fund and U.S. and Canadian authorities to take certain actions regarding this project.
  
  Whereas, The Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor exemplifies efficiency and solid security practices that a private and public partnership can provide to the citizens of Michigan, the United States, and Canada and has been recognized by the United States Federal Highway Administration as the most efficient international crossing; and
  
  Whereas, The Detroit International Bridge Company (DIBC) crossing plan to develop an enhancement span of the Ambassador Bridge would provide for an additional crossing between the cities of Detroit and Windsor to meet the traffic needs of the region for years to come; and
  
  Whereas, The DIBC has stated it will work with the state of Michigan to leverage the private investment used in the creation of an enhancement span to help garner $2 billion in match funding to be used to improve Michigan’s roads and bridges by qualifying DIBC expenditures as toll credits under federal law; and
  
  Whereas, The Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC) study, being carried out by the Michigan Department of Transportation, the U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Transport Canada, and the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, calls upon the need for an additional span and continues to study alternate sites for a new bridge, while private investors are willing to construct and operate a second crossing to be financed without expense to the taxpayer; and
  
  Whereas, The state of Michigan has made a significant investment to improve the traffic flow to the current Ambassador Bridge through initiatives such as the Gateway Project to address traffic flow from the freeway and interstates to the Ambassador Bridge, as well as improving the plaza to accommodate international commerce;
  
  now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate,
  
  That we support the plan of the Detroit International Bridge Company to establish an enhancement span to the Ambassador Bridge;
  
  and be it further Resolved,
  
  That we urge the Michigan Strategic Fund to immediately approve an Inducement Resolution for Private Activity Bonds for the DIBC enhancement span and Gateway connections to the Ambassador Bridge;
  
  and be it further Resolved,
  
  That we urge both the United States and Canadian governments to expedite the permits to complete the DIBC enhancement span to allow for the second crossing to become operational in a timely fashion;
  
  and be it further Resolved,
  
  That we urge that the DRIC study recognize and support the DIBC’s plan to develop an enhancement span;
  
  and be it further Resolved,
  
  That we recommend that the Canadian government finish the improvements to alleviate traffic flow concerns in Windsor from Canadian Highway 401 to the Ambassador Bridge;
  
  and be it further Resolved, That copies of this resolution be transmitted to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the members of the Michigan congressional delegation, the Prime Minister of Canada, the Ontario Parliamentary delegation, the mayor of Detroit, and the mayor of Windsor.

Room At The Junction

It looks like there is no room at the inn for any of the new Mexican refugees were coming to Windsor. This is according to Ronna Warsh, general manager of social services. Now that was a big surprise to me given that the vacancy rate in Windsor is so high. I would have thought that there are lots of houses and apartments for rent and probably at a pretty good rental rate too.

So I got to thinking and wondered if there was a location in Windsor where some of these refugee families could live and eat until such time as homes could be found for them .

And then it hit me. Why not use the Junction for this. I have attended a couple of press conferences there and attended the luncheon where the proceeds went to Hospice. It has a huge amount of space where dormitory beds could be set up or perhaps walls could be set up for families. It has facilities that can feed hundreds of people. I'm certain that proper washroom and shower facilities could be added very simply.

I would have thought that this would work and could end any disagreements between the Junction's owners and the City.

My feeling is that that City should seriously consider this as an alternative. Here's why. Remember that Globe and Mail story the other day that I posted. It said:

• "Now some Windsor residents worry the loonie's climb will leave this border city even more dependent on its "sin economy" - the casino, bars and strip joints - an economy that's causing some Windsor citizens to fear going downtown at night."

Then I am sure that you saw the Star story that said:

• "If you have the entertainment that brings them over, it doesn't matter," said Renaldo Agostino, marketing director for the strip clubs Cheetahs, Leopards and Danny's. "The more expensive American dollar never stopped Canadians from going to America. Whenever I was going over, it was for something I couldn't get here. It's not going to stop them either."
  
  Agostino said a lower-valued dollar, our drinking age and that full nudity thing -- which is forbidden in U.S. strip clubs -- are not downtown Windsor's only assets."

While they may not be our only assets but they seem to be some pretty damn good ones for some of the American visitors that come over here on the weekend.

Now I got to thinking again about the zoning for the Junction. My belief is that the zoning does not prohibit a sex club from opening up nor a massage parlour.

Can you imagine, there could be dancing at the Junction, lap dancing. Who the heck would care if there was music or not with dancing like that! So that kind of activity cannot be prohibited by the Entertainment Lounge Bylaw. And I'm sure that you read the story as well about the court case in Newmarket that said that a certain activity during a "full body massage is not a sexual act and does not constitute prostitution."

In this case, unlike previously, the Junction owners should have the support of both of the Ward 2 Councillors. Both Councillors Jones and Postma voted to approve an adult entertainment parlour at the Wellington ie a gay strip bar and at the same Council meeting voted against the Junction becoming an "Entertainment Lounge." In fact, Brian Masse should also support the new activity, even though it is very near his home, since he was at the Council meeting and did not oppose the Wellington application.

Even Ms Warsh could get involved too. I bet she might be able to get some provincial money to train some of the Mexican refugees who are on social assistance for a new career just as she did for the Sutherland call centre workers who were on the Ontario Works program.

Don't forget as well that Windsor kicked in $100K for the call centre training too and is building them a parking lot. That's is about equal to what Eddie says the Mexican immigration issue is costing us BEFORE the Senior Levels pay us back the vast majority of the costs!

I wonder if one took a poll amongst the Junction neighbours and offered them the choice between a place where refugess could live temporarily or becoming Sin City West, which one they would prefer.

An Entertainment Lounge might look better and better very soon.

DRTP Truck Expressway Or...

Oh that the Mayor of ours is such a kidder. He's got such a funny sense of humour.

If you watched the video of the scrum of the Mayor on the Windsor Star website, you will see the Mayor making a comment that DRTP has been talking with a number of Councillors about their new proposal.

Surprisingly, but not really, the Mayor chose not to tell us what the conversations were about. Do you think that was deliberate to scare people along the DRTP corridor to send in right away their approval notice of Greenlink? Do you think that the Mayor is desperate to get up his approval numbers?

He could, of course, have said that it had nothing to do with the truck expressway but that it had everything to do with a doublestack rail tunnel that it appears DRTP has been pushing. But that would be too simple. And in Windsor, nothing is ever simple or what it appears to be on its face.

I noticed some lobbying statistics for DRTP in the US for 2006. It is of course not clear to me whether these costs are for the truck tunnel or for the rail tunnel project or both. It is just strange to me that they have two different accounts but that could just be an anomaly depending on how the Lobbyist firm set up the account.

I'm sure however that we will hear from Mike Hurst very, very soon. After all, they would not be spending lobbying money for nothing now would they.

It will probably turn into something involving the Zalev lands as well since that subject and Brownfields have been in the news and at Council recently. If you hear something about rail rationalization soon, then it's a slam-dunk.

It Does NOT Add Up

OMG, fer sure man, that latest City Greenlink ad is really cool and totally awesome. Like gross, someone had to stay up late at night doing all that math. Barf me out, I would've been freakin'. I would not have stayed up crunching numbers when I could've partied instead. What a bummer.

Another full-page ad in the Windsor Star thanks to the deep pockets of the taxpayers of Windsor. Don't you worry, I know it wasn't budgetted for, but money is no object, especially taxpayer money, when the careers of certain Members of Council are at stake.

I'm not quite sure how seven years fit into all this. I knew there were previous discussions but I must admit that I would have thought this border issue started in November/December of 2002 when the Joint Management Committee report came out publicly.

Eddie has this Mike fixation it seems. Eddie just had to drag ex-Mayor Mike Hurst into this mess as well didn't he so he can share in the blame. However, whether it is five years or seven years, it really doesn't matter. Who was the Mayor for most of that time and who was elected to solve the problem? Our fearful leader, Eddie!

Did you notice that the tone of the ad was one of desperation? As I tried to point out, the number of people approving Greenlink is not very impressive. For all the money being spent, it looks like a lot of people aren't convinced that Greenlink is realistic or doable. They understand the game that is being played and are tired of being used as pawns.

It's been opened up to the entire County of Essex now and not just to Windsorites. After all, Warden Santos has to do something to help out his new, bestest buddy. Why that's regional cooperation at its finest, except for Big Box stores. Maybe now LaSalle's Mayor Baxter will support Greenlink. (As a Letter to the Editor said "Maybe some day you [Baxter] might need the help of Windsor's residents for one of your projects.")

Speaking of things being added up, it looks like some numbers were missed. I'm not quite sure how they would fit in with the message being conveyed in the ad. Let me tell you what some of them are to be helpful:

1. $300 million of Border Infrastructure Fund money not used to build a road to the border


2. billions of dollars sitting around waiting for this Mayor and Council to put forward a cooperative proposal and not a proposal designed to counter


3. 10,000 direct and indirect, high-paying jobs not created


4. $3.5 million paid to lawyers and consultants


5. one year wasted on THINKING BIG


6. almost two years wasted on FULL TUNNELLING


7. how many more months to be wasted on GREENLINK


8. four full-page ads in the Windsor Star so far, five Ward meetings, mailing to thousands of households


9. many radio ads


10. 98% of the Windsor population not sending in notices of approval of what is being proposed

I just figured out what this all added up to:

TOTAL INCOMPETENCE AND

TOTAL FAILURE

PS. Now I don't want to be an old stick in the mud. However, I think someone should tell the really cool and very hip advertising agency of the City that their numbers are all wrong. I think they forgot about leap year and the extra day that is added. You know, an extra day of stalling, 24 extra hours of snubbing the Senior Levels of Government and threatening them with lawsuits, 1,440 minutes of asking why no one listens to Windsor.

Do you feel me?

Forced Congestion As A Buy-Out Tool

There's something about Greenlink that just bothers me. Oh I know that it is really nothing more than another "starting point" in the Mayor's non-negotiable bargaining position. As the Mayor said in the Star:

• "Francis said details of the Schwartz plan, such as service roads and landscaping, can be tweaked, but the city will not negotiate the proposed tunnels with DRIC.
  
  "That last thing we want is for the province to come back and say: 'OK, we'll give you one tunnel,'" he said. "The amount of tunnelling and the connectivity of neighbourhoods is not negotiable."

To be direct about it, the Mayor has just said he's prepared to negotiate even right after the public made comments on his latest newly revised and improved Schwartz plan. Councillor Halberstadt should immediately object and claim that the Mayor has compromised (oooops, there's that C-word again) in exactly the same way that he was unfairly criticized for doing that.

I'm still waiting to find out how the City is allowed to negotiate partial tunneling under the Resolution that calls for full tunneling. I wonder if Counselor Marra could explain that. Oh it really doesn't matter. Eddie will ignore whatever it is that he wants to ignore. Hmmmm, I wonder if this is a breach of the Code of Conduct that Council wants approved so that I can make a complaint with the Integrity Commissioner. Now that should be fun.

That's what makes me really nervous about all this. I'm not been impressed with Eddie's negotiating skills such as the other deals that he has been involved like the Canderel subleases, the Mady garage, the five cent parking fees and who knows what on the East End arena.

But it is more than that. I can't really figure out why Sam stopped at the expressway and why he didn't go further with the road right to the bridge. Oh I know the excuse, we have to wait to see where DRIC is going to place the Plaza and the border crossing:

• "Until the site of the new bridge and plaza is determined, the exact path of the easternmost portion of the highway leading to it can't be known. "All we can say is that road will feed into the plaza."
  
  The city wants the plaza located on 110 acres it owns in Brighton Beach."

However I don't buy that.

The most obvious explanation for the not going further is that would mean that the cost for Sam's road would have to be increased. Since Sam has not done any work north of EC role, then the cost that he has set out for Greenlink ought to not be compared with the DRIC numbers which I believe are the costs right to the border.

But I don't think it is that either.

What I think is a connection north of EC role is designed to be the last-ditch effort to put the Ambassador Bridge out of business. The road to the border is being done a step at a time and my belief is that it is an effort by all of the three governments combined, Federal, Provincial and Municipal. Oh sure they may fight and scream amongst themselves like children but that is just so that each one can get an advantage over the other parties. All three are united in wanting to block the Ambassador Bridge Company.

The object is to build a variation of the DRIC road to the new bridge to remove as many trucks from going north on Huron Church Road as possible. Even the million or so local international trucks will be encouraged not to use that road. If that happens, or it seems to be happening, won't that put a squeeze on the Ambassador Bridge company that might force them to sell out?

How will that be done? Very simply.

If you remember the drawing that was shown in Sam's first presentation of "Huron Church “Boulevard” – The Champs Elysèes of Canada," the road in that drawing only showed two lanes north and south and not three. It showed a nice bicycling lane and a walkway for pedestrians that must have taken over one lane of traffic. If that doesn't show the City's perspective, then nothing does. Now perhaps the reason why the City is opposed, and has been opposed for the last five years, to any plan on Huron Church road is becoming clearer.

Brain Masse in his Detroit radio debate with Dan Stamper confirmed that the road was the big issue and nothing else:

• "it doesn’t take away the main problem – that’s going to and from the border crossing in the Detroit-Windsor region and that’s important to note...
  
  you still have the problem of the trucks and the cars can’t get to the 401. And that, at the end of the day, that’s the real problem. That’s why there’s been such discussion in our community over the years to come up with a, something that’s going to be healthy for the local area, as well as, the flow of the traffic through our region and that is important for the rest of the United States and the rest of Canada, but also is important for our regional economy...
  
  once again it just comes down to the bottom line of how do you get to the through traffic from the 401 that needs to go there and also capacity for local businesses and also more importantly, to our commuters."

Ontario Minister Cansfield has has made her contribution to the road issue:

• "It will be in mid 2007 when a decision for a preferred bridge location will be made and Ontario will say how to get from 401 to there
  
  The Schwartz Report fitted in with the Province’s planning since all was accepted other than the Horseshoe Road and going through Ojibway ("Information input into their study") ie 2 KM difference at Todd Lane
  
  People on Huron Church don’t want to mingle with heavy trucks.
  
  The Government's stated objective was to separate long-haul traffic from local traffic
  
  They want to have Huron Church as a viable business section again and to maintain economic viability ie have it as a commercial route for tourists, attractions, dinner
  
  The avoidance of large vehicles on that route is a huge and legitimate issue
  
  People have had difficult times along that stretch of highway
  
  Preferred route is a freeway with NO driveways off of it."

Transport Minister Cannon on Melanie Deveau's show just had to come back and talk about the road during his interview when he said:

• "And of course the Government of Ontario is a partner as well as the Town of Windsor and so we have to be able to, I think, be open minded, listen to everything that has to be said and at the end of the day of course, we are going to make the decisions with the Government of Ontario on the specific design and the architecture of the road. But as I was mentioning this morning in the press conference, you know, I am a former town councillor and so I am always more sensitive to concerns that are brought up by people living in this area. The Ambassador Bridge, I come back to that Melanie just for a second, it is an important issue because you know there is the environmental assessment that they want to do, but at the end of the day there is also the fact that this access road will be going directly through the city of Windsor and I am not, I am not necessarily convinced that that is the right way and the right approach to take."

Clearly the "road to the bridge" is the last gasp of the Governments. Every other tactic from traffic numbers to security and redundancy to plaza size etc. etc. has failed. It is all so transparent and Sam's omission just confirmed what I already believed. As I wrote before,

• "Effectively, the Minister has given the City the blessing to reduce the lanes on Huron Church, just do it in the name of a greening effort. Create gridlock on Huron Church to discourage trucks from using it to go to the Bridge. You want to go the twinned bridge? Sure, just be prepared to sit on a one-lane narrow road for an hour or more. Truckers will say the heck with that and go to the bridge that has a six-lane highway leading to it.
  
  Why how can the Bridge Co. sue...they still have their road! It's not the Government's fault if truckers choose a different way to cross the border. It's the law of competition isn't it! It is a scorched earth tactic designed to scare the Bridge Co."

Unfortunately, Sam's presentation really did ruin everything. Why the man said that what the Ambassador Bridge people did before was right. You could build a road along Huron Church that could be used for traffic and could connect the communities. If we take Sam's logic to its conclusion, then a road could be built on Huron Church right to the Ambassador Bridge. If his concept worked south of E C Row, it could be built north of the E C Row too. Now that is not what the Mayor and Windsor Council want but that is what Sam gave them.

And as for the Senior Levels, they are going to have a tough time explaining why the $300 million BIF funds were never used as an intermediate solution to connect Highway 401 to the Ambassador Bridge. After all, that is what the money was supposed to be used for.

Come on now, the DRIC road can be built right to the Ambassador Bridge and everybody knows it. There is no reason why it could not have been built before now since the road could go both to the Ambassador and to a new DRIC bridge if it was ever to be built. The only reason obviously is to pressure the Bridge Company.

I wonder what will happen after that. When the Governments have lost their negotiating position to their opponent, will sanity finally prevail?

Just so you will get a better idea why Sam's 2 lanes are critical on Huron Church and why nothing was mentioned about it during Greenlink, take a look at this story about Australia. Don't you just love it. Keeping trucks away from the Ambassador Bridge is the only way a DRIC Bridge could survive too because its tolls would be several times higher unless taxpayers subsidized it:

• "Profit over Practicality? Lane Cove Tunnel Sydney
  
  The Sydney Morning Herald ran a story recently which gave a glimpse into the congestion problems suffered by Sydney residents. The Lane Cove Tunnel is entirely dependent on government-created congestion to turn a profit...
  
  The original idea was for the NSW government to deliberately create congestion on nearby Epping road (by narrowing lanes) to force motorists onto the tunnel. It was election time when the plan was meant to go ahead and hence someone in power realised this was not going to be popular and currently the plans have been delayed.
  
  The delay has meant the NSW government has had to pay $25 million dollars of tax payer money to the toll road owners for not honouring its contractual obligations (to narrow Epping road).
  
  Of course narrowing Epping road isn’t what the government will call this, the idea is to build dedicated bus and bicycle lanes which would then create the desired level of congestion for Lane Cove Tunnel. The plan will still go ahead in February next year."

The 69 Questions Sam & Eddie Must Answer

With all of the taxpayer money being spent to gain approval of Greenlink, I thought you might be interested to know what some readers of the Windsor Star have to say about Greenlink from the opposite side.

Here is why I decided to post the comments. Obviously we've heard about the huge percentages in favor of the Schwartz Git-R-Done solution. Except the reality is that only a small number of Windsorites have given their approval as I pointed out this morning. When I went to the Star Forum website, I expected to see almost everything being favorable to Greenlink. Imagine my surprise when I saw all of these negative comments.

Where are these comments being reflected, certainly not by the Mayor or even by the Star itself?

Accordingly, I decided to give them an outlet. I've no idea how many hits the Star's website gets. When Don McArthur said that he had "seven" readers, I knew he was kidding but my suspicion is that the total numbers are significantly less than the Star's circulation.

This is from "Sound Off! Will Schwartz's plan make Windsor the envy of other North American cities?"

1. The Sam Schwartz tunnel doesn't look like a tunnel at all. It looks more like the below grade proposal with a bit of dirt on top. Besides that the Sam Schwartz tunnel will be in sections not one complete tunnel which is similar to the below grade proposal which also has some tunneling parts.


2. Looking at the Sam Schwartz tunnel it would still have a major disruption on the business section.


3. Schwartz proposal would send all the provincial engineers back to the drawing board for another five years.


4. So the guy who wanted to pave Ojibway Park in 2005 has morphed into Mr. GreenLink in 2007


5. $500,000 for proposing slighty longer and narrower tunnels than the DRIC plan!


6. First of all its too expensive, second, why does Windsor have to have a "tunnel freeway".


7. As for the pollution the trucks generate, the root of the problem comes from the trucks backed up because American customs are slow to process them


8. what if there is a major accident, and/or involving dangerous chemicals and flammables or even a terrorist attack


9. what if the tunnel sustains major damage, think of the traffic mess that would generate.


10. The DRIC team was called on the carpet and criticized for not proposing a vented tunnel with scrubbers that would magically clean and purify the air. They told us that this technology didn't exist, but we beat them up anyhow. So, Sam, Eddie, where are the scrubbers and air cleaners in your proposal


11. Why does the tunneled route from the 401 not split, one way toward the new bridge, and the other to the Ambassador Bridge? Trucks will continue to take the Ambassador Bridge because of the likely cheaper (and competitive) tolls, which will mean they will still be on our city streets without a tunneled route.


12. when are people gonna realize that if a road goes underground or not underfround it has the same environmental impact, jut hiding things underground doesnt make anything disapear.


13. would you ever want to relocate your children near a park that is built on top of a highway


14. it still wont lure Windsor's image. It might create a few people who want to drive through it once


15. it will be an eyesore after a few months.


16. There is no perfect plan except to open all the booths that run at 50% at the bridge.


17. There seems to be a new plan every few months by the various governements


18. This plan is designed for a wow factor - yes - great. But how realistic is it?


19. No scrubbers, except that the City has criticised the DRIC for not having scrubbers.


20. Narrower lanes. If 4 lanes are all that are needed, why is the city of Windsor stating Huron Church Road - 6-lanes - are not adequate for the Ambassador Bridge.


21. No solution for the existing border crossing presented.


22. Who will pay for the maintenance of the green spaces, tennis courts etc. and/or construction? The FEDS have committed to 50% of the cost of the ROAD. The city can barely afford to maintain their parks as it is, let alone MORE parkspace.


23. If trees can "scrub" the emissions, what is the point of such long tunneled sections? Clearly, air quality is not the huge concern it has been made out to be.


24. What about Sandwich area? Are they not worthy what South Windsor is getting? Sandwich will now be "sandwiched" between TWO border highways and TWO bridges.


25. This plan sounds better but the concerns that remain are the traffic volume, air quality and how the city will maintain all the open green areas.


26. This problem goes way beyond dressing up Huron Church Rd.


27. It makes me wonder why the city is so intent on getting trucks off Huron Road when they don't seem to mind the trucks using the Tunnel and going thru the middle of down town.


28. Make a link to the existing bridge - otherwise you will have trucks taking local steets to take advantage of low toll rates at the existing bridge


29. Let the bridge company build a new bridge and they will absorb all the cost.


30. Where are the details of this plan?!? The guys Sam/Eddie have trotted in here are the guys [involved in]the Big Dig - a project that went $10 billion over budget!


31. The Windsor plan and the DRIC plan are, except for a few points, the same thing. Who's kidding who? Everybody managed to waste a lot of money that we, as taxpayers can't afford


32. It was still a mistake not to include Ambassador with a split at E.C. Row as others suggested. It could be tunneled up to Ambassador too for more cost, but DRIC is ignoring Ambassador too


33. Tunnels to nowhere. Both the dric and this new greenway do not address the fact they are leading to a bridge that is not built. Where will Michigan want a bridge to come out? Michigan is nearly broke and will not help fund a new bridge and they dont care about our problems


34. We have barely enough money to maintain our existing parks. Where is the money going to come from to maintain these new parks? How many more parks and natural areas do we need on the west side?


35. widen and upgrade EC Row Expressway and extend Lauzon Parkway out to the 401 and beyond to Highway 3.


36. What magical solution is there to ensure that only local traffic uses the Ambassador bridge


37. The city's proposal is lacking details - substantial ones that bring to question the over cost-advantages


38. Where is traffic routed during the construction of these tunnels?


39. Why are there no maintenance tunnels shown in the "short tunnels?"


40. Where is the emergency access/egress from these tunnels and what is the minimum distance required between emergency entrances?


41. What fireproofing designs are anticipated?


42. Where are the pumping stations to pump out water from the tunnels?


43. Where do these pumping stations empty into?...


44. What about relocations of all the underground utilities along Huron Church Road such as hydro, gas, water mains, and sewer lines?


45. How does the plan propose dealing with the high water table in the area and potential leaks?


46. How does the plan deal with the substandard soil conditions in the area?...


47. What state of the art rail tunnel is Sam Schwartz talking about for the relief of traffic post-2035?


48. How will tunnels be expanded should traffic volumes increase beyond what is expected?


49. Who will pay for the maintenance of parkland and tree replacement - studies indicate that pollution kills trees - notably particulate matter and nitrous oxide.


50. Maybe if Tecumseh just starts building a tunnel maybe we might decide on which one we want, worked for a arena!


51. The DRIC proposes something that they know no one will accept and then Windsor pays an additional half milllion to basically expand on the DRIC idea.


52. So much for not accepting anything less than a fully tunelled route.


53. Are Jet Fans a fancy word for scrubbers or will they simply push the polluted air out of the covered portions back onto the neighborhoods?


54. score one for south windsor but nothing for the far west end.


55. There are so many unexpected and hidden expenses to come, it's common sense to anyone with half a brain. This candy coated "paradise proposal" is the "Shock and Awe" campaign for Windsor. I'm glad to see the residents aeren't falling for it.


56. I guess our taxes can forever skyrocket, and the city can hire a whole new slew of people to maintain our hippy gardens


57. To be honest I thought , WOW, finally a plan excelling all others by promoting large attractive green spaces , plus useable for all ages and environmentally correct. A real bonus. Then I start reading the comments . So many cons that my elation got deflated.


58. Too much money has been spent and nothing ever get's accomplished.


59. All back to square one when you think too much


60. the delays are not related to border crossing capacity. Border delays occur because the current system for clearing shipments into the USA combined with the USA's demand for tight border security is why the border backs up.


61. The Ambassador Bridge should be replaced with a new span because the current span is nearing the end of its designed service life. The owner is willing to do it on his dime. Let him.


62. We already have a corridor through the west side, Huron Road. Use the $1.5 billion dollars to improve that corridor. Capacity is not a factor, traffic volumes will not increase considerably into the future. Do not be fooled by economists and politicians that preach unending economic growth.


63. A new border crossing will not spur investment in this region. A border crossing that bypasses the city will expedite shipments to eastern Ontario and the new auto capital of Canada, Kitchener/Waterloo/Cambridge


64. The State of Michigan is threatening to stop funding MDOT contributions to DRIC because Lansing has recognized DRIC for what it has become a tax dollar sink hole.


65. Another crossing only means that US Customs will have fewer agents at each crossing.


66. The money can be spent to impove the quality of an existing corridor to the benefit of those that drive it, do business along it and live near it.


67. you want your kids playing in a park with jet fans blowing fumes and brake dust on them. Not me!


68. Pick one people. DRIC or the city plan and make it quick, 'cause there is a third option... Hwy 402 from London to Sarnia which means totally bypassing Windsor. If we can't come up with a solid decision on one or the other and if we put up enough flak in the air about both proposals, the Feds and the province are simply going to wash their hands, turn their back on us and pump all the money into the 402 Sarnia corridor.


69. The simple fact is there will be the same fumes bellowing out of the openings of all these tunnels as there is now, they think by adding 5 billion plants that they will filter the air enough to couter act the polution, that is perpoustous.

Whew, not a bad list of issues prepared by non-engineering types. Imagine what professional engineers would ask of Sam and Parsons Brinckerhoff. Perhaps we should give this to Sam to answer but then again I wouldn't want to have to spend another half million of taxpayer dollars to do so.

My point in setting out all of this information is just to let you know not to believe everything you hear from City Hall about the support of Windsorites for Greenlink. With flaws like this, can anyone take the Mayor's solution seriously or should we just view it as another stall tactic.

Can some of Sam's work be used, sure. Can some of DRIC's work be used, sure. Can some of the Ambassador Bridge's work be used, sure again.

We won't have a solution however in Windsor when Sam's work is used to "counter" that of DRIC and when the Ambassador Bridge is viewed as the enemy. We won't have a solution in Windsor when Governments believe that they can force the Ambassador Bridge out of business instead of recognizing that this Company has made this border crossing the most important in North America and the key border crossing for Canada's economy. We won't have a solution in Windsor when the parties involved refuse to sit down and talk to each other.

Is there a border solution? Of course there is and it was reachable years ago. It is the one that has been proposed all the way along except we mere taxpayers have not been a let in on it. It's just like in Sarnia where all the studies in the world wound up with a bridge not upriver or downriver but right at the existing crossing. And Governments built expressways to serve those two bridges.

That has always been the solution and we are just going through an exercise designed to force the sale of a "private" business.

Observations

Here are a few observations from recent events in Windsor.

SINK OR SWIM TOGETHER

WeACT is on the City's in camera agenda on Monday I have heard. OMB litigation and all of that.

Funny, I would have thought that the Mayor, Councillors and the citizens ought to be on the same side in opposing a Provincial whitewash audit. After all, don't we all want to know the truth. Hmmmm do you think that maybe some don't.

I wish I could be there to hear what they talk about. Do you think someone might actually say that the audit from the Ministry is a total and complete farce now that we know what the Terms of Reference are. Councillor Halberstadt might but his colleagues will not listen to him.

Will Councillor Marra stand up and say that it is a whitewash and that Council should object since that is not what Mayor, Council and Windsor citizens want. He had said that the Ministry should be given a chance to do their audit and then decide if more has to be done once their report is in! Isn't it painfully obvious now that "more has to be done?" Naw, if he won't do it on his tunneling Motion and fight for a full tunnel as the Motion says, he won't do it here either.

Our Municipal elected officials supported in their Resolution a much broader Section 10 audit which the Minister of Municipal Affairs refused to include as part of the package. They should be outraged and demand it be undertaken since we are spending over $150,000 on the audit.

Oh come now. You cannot be that naïve. Don't you think the Members of Council were told to stick together in a unified fashion so that they can all survive together. They are just going to tough their way through it. And be thrilled when they are exonerated.

NO BOOKS AVAILABLE AT THE LIBRARY FOR CIRCULATION

Sometimes I cannot really believe what the Councillor formerly known as Councillor Budget says. Someone really does need to muzzle him or at least make him think before he opens his mouth.

He is a member of the Library Board. Libraries, in case you didn't know it, dear reader, are primarily in the book business. They also provide computers, the new way that information is distributed, to those members of the community that do not have access to one They buy books so that they can circulate them to members of the Community. They buy computers for information distribution.

So what is the former Councillor Budget's solution to their budget cutting:

• "Instead of following board member Coun. Dave Brister's plan to save $742,000 by making cuts to various library operations -- such as buying fewer books and computers than planned...
  
  Brister, who opposed four library board motions involving the $652,000 cost-cutting package, said afterward his plan would have worked and services did not have to be affected.
  
  "It could have been done entirely without closing."

I have to admit that Councillor is absolutely right. Using his logic, in a few years, the Library System would not have purchased any books or computers and their shelves would be bare and the PC terminals hopelessly out of date for the new technology.

No computers and no books mean that no one would ever go to the Library anymore. They could stay open, "entirely without closing," but no one would show up. Imagine the savings that could be made then!

We should not be surprised however at how the Councillor thinks about cutting. Wasn't he the one that said that the Art Gallery should sell the works of art that were not hanging on the walls of the Gallery to help reduce costs?

But it's okay, we can have a premier sports facility and he can support spending money for Detroit sports extravaganzas.

CANDEREL LEASE

Whew....thank goodness all of the space has now been rented out.

I wonder what the total cost to the City taxpayers will be just for subleases. Don't forget in your calculations the $580,000 to renovate third-floor office space at 1 Riverside Dr. W., and $350,000 for renovations on the fourth floor. I think the City was prepared to spend $20 per square foot on build out costs.

I am having some difficulties in figuring out what the Mayor says the loss to the City will be on the monthly rents. Remember that I wrote a BLOG on the "Deal of the Century."

I speculated on the following on the subleases:

• unbelievably low rent for the initial term of the lease to get rid of the asset


• huge payments for leasehold improvements and renovations where little work is required to be done


• sweetheart renewal deal for a very long term


• nice deal on monthly costs including how tenant space is calculated


• deal on escalators for price increases

I guess we will have to wait until someone at City Hall decides to open up the books before we can find out the real information.

However, I just don't understand the Mayor's numbers, just like I never understood his numbers on the watermain Levy presentation he made at Council.

In the Star story about this matter, it was written:

• "Even though the two floors have been rented, only about 55 per cent of the city’s costs will be recovered, leaving the city still to pay about $450,000 in rent each year, Francis said.
  
  The average lease rate for both floors is $23.70 per square foot, he said."

How can that possibly be? I had blogged previously the City's ad for the Canderel space [December 15, 2005 "Your Tax Dollars At Work"] and had written:

• "Remember I told you that the sub-lease rental was slashed to $10 per square foot because the City could not get anyone interested in subletting the space. (The Star reported the City was paying $18 per square foot plus about $15 in common fees for maintenance and taxes) Does that mean that others were paying $10 before since the $10 being negotiated now would be comparable to what others are paying?
  
  And it may not even be $10. It could be less. City solicitor George Wilkki had said "the city is willing to look at "anything reasonable.... Any offer that would come in the door we would take to council and see what council wants to do with it."

I'm so confused. How can the average lease rate be $23.70 per square foot when it looks like the City was prepared to take even less than $10 per square foot? Does the Mayor's number include common fees as well which would make for a rental of about $8.70 per square foot so that the City is losing about $10 per square foot on the lease rate?

I really would like to know how the Mayor calculated the average lease rate. I am going to write to 311 and ask to be provided with the basis of that calculation. If I ever get the answer I'll post it here.

I wish we could get the facts easily. But that would be a novelty for this City.

FREE WINDSOR STAR "FOR LEASE" ADS FOR LANDLORDS

Congratulations to the Windsor Star and to Dave Hall its business editor for attempting to help reduce the vacancy rate of business premises in downtown Windsor. I suggest that any landlord that has vacant space immediately contact Dave and ask him to write a story about your premises. It costs nothing. How else to explain the following story:

• "NEW CENTRE PLANNED FOR FORMER RESTAURANT
  
  Despite the fact the property will eventually be expropriated to accommodate a long-planned $30-million expansion of the Windsor-Detroit tunnel plaza, a new pharmacy and laser centre is planned for a former restaurant on Goyeau Street.
  
  It will be located in the former Trevi and Musashi restaurants, according to Abe TaqTaq, whose family owns the property in addition to the adjacent tunnel duty free shop.
  
  TaqTaq said he's still trying to attract interest from physicians and a pharmacist to lease space in the 5,500-square-foot building.
  
  "We're also in discussions with a company that operates laser centres," said TaqTaq.
  
  Plans to expand the tunnel plaza "appear to be off in the distant future and in the meantime, we're just trying to fill the space," he said."

I would suggest that Mr. TaqTaq change the sign on his building since it suggests that the premises have already been leased out to a pharmacy and a laser clinic. He may be losing perspective tenants who think that the space is already gone when it looks like no one has made a firm commitment yet. Mind you, who would want to lease space in the building where it may be expropriated at some indefinite time in the future.

If you want to see what the sign looks like just go to my BLOG September 27, 2007 "A Picture Is Worth A Lot Of Dollars."

The story is interesting from another perspective as well. Since Mr. TaqTaq is involved in the duty-free shop at that Tunnel, presumably he would know what is going on at that location. Accordingly, it appears that the Tunnel Plaza improvements are not going to happen for a very long time and it may also mean that the US$75 million deal with the City of Detroit may be in limbo as well.

I wish I could give you more information about both of those transactions but only the Mayor's office knows for sure and they don't tell mere citizens anything. I guess the only information that we can get is from reading tea leaves based on the slightest of facts.

DETROIT'S TUNNELLEER HAS LEFT

According to Crain's Detroit, Derrick Miller, the Chief Information Officer for Detroit's Mayor has left the employ of the City. Apparently, he is to be involved in a "new entrepreneurial venture."

What makes a story interesting for Windsor is that my understanding is that he was the key person on the Detroit side responsible for the transaction with Windsor with respect to the Tunnel.

The timing of his leaving combined with Mr. TaqTaq's comment above suggests that the Tunnel deal may not be done for quite some time, if at all.

Now I have heard, but do not know if this is true, that Mr. Miller's new job may involve municipal finance. If so, perhaps his first client could be our Mayor. He might be able to help him find US$75 million since so far it would not appear that there is a financial backer on this transaction unless {gulp} it is Windsor taxpayers' money!

HALF EMPTY MATH

We have heard about the overwhelming support behind Greenlink but...as the infamous Councillor of Ward 1 would say, since it's only about 2-3% of the 200,000 people who live in Windsor, it is hardly an endorsement.

Here are some numbers according to the Star: 32,800 website hits, Ward meetings attracted 2,925 people, 829 comment cards, 1,624 callers to 311.

BUT, approvals have come so far from less than 10% of those people according to the Mayor's percentages. I'll let you know what some of the other 90% think this afternoon in my BLOG based on a random survey of concerned Windsorites. And it is NOT a pretty picture.

If we look at the Ambassador Bridge YouTube numbers for their animation of the Enhancement Project http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrVM_ReGCSE they have received over 14,000 hits with minimal publicity compared with what this City spent on Greenlink.

GAZELLE FEEDER AWARD

Congratulations to Matt Fischer, chief executive officer of the Windsor-Essex Development Commission, for winning a President's Award from the Economic Developers Association of Canada for developing and writing "a comprehensive guide to economic development.

I'd like to give him an award if he has created some jobs in Windsor since his appointment in February with the Commission. They were supposed to have some kind of a game plan during their 120 days of action for "plans to restructure the office with a stronger focus on business attraction and retention."

It would be nice to know what the herd of gazelle feeders have accomplished

IS LARRY HORWITZ RUNNING FOR MAYOR

He has to be. No one in living memory, other than a politician, has been in a Gord Henderson's column so many times as Larry Horwitz in so short a period of time.

To be honest, when I saw his name again,I was hoping for another Pamela Anderson story. Instead, we got another "let's help Eddie bring something else from St. Clair College downtown so he can justify spending money to bring them there because he failed with the University."

I wonder if, in their tour of those successful cities in Michigan, they asked businesspeople some questions. The most obvious ones are:

• Do you have a City Hall that works with business or one that fights with business


• Do you have a City Hall that won't allow a garage to be built or to replace at a house that is falling down


• Do you have a City Hall that chases developers and businesses out of town and won't work with major companies but calls them enemies


• Do you have a City Hall that has to call in outside auditors to review their books


• Do you have a City Hall that threatens to sue the Senior Levels of Government, the same ones from which they want grants


• Do you have a City Hall that for a period of over five years has not taken advantage of $300 million of funds to build a road to the border that would have created thousands of high-paying, badly needed, infrastructure and related jobs


• Have your license fees increased dramatically over the period of the year


• What are your water, sewer and electrical charges and have they increased dramatically


• What are your property and business taxes like and have they increased dramatically

Gord is right about one thing. As he said, "we also need a change in attitude." Of course that will not happen with our Mayor and Council.

There was also a hilarious joke in his column:

• "With the arena under construction, the riverfront done and a border deal just months away, Horwitz argues that Windsor's next great civic crusade must be about downtown revival."

DUH...if the arena was downtown, and not stuck out in the boonies invisible for most people, our downtown would be in the midst of its revival now. And guess who has to take responsibility for being silent when the arena could have been downtown but instead was moved to the East End in a behind the scenes deal that never worked out.

So tell me Larry and Gord, How can we "Git-R-Done" downtown now!

ROSS PAUL HITS BACK

It seems that the University through its President has decided to take an offensive position with respect to the downtown Engineering Complex. I guess they got tired of being the fall guys for Eddie's urban village failure downtown

Mind you it's their own fault. The University and its Board have been just about as secretive with respect to the Complex as is the City with almost anything. If they had been open and transparent with the community about what they were doing with the Complex, then they would not have been subject to the attacks in the Star and the President would not have had to have written the guest column in the Star's editorial page.

Oh please, don't write me and tell me that it was purely coincidental about the timing with Gord's column and Dr. Paul's comment. Regular readers know better than that. We had Gord's front-page story in the Star on Thursday too.

I must admit I wasn't sure if Gord had been demoted to a newspaper reporter when I saw the story in Thursday's paper "Engineering building doubtful for city core." I guess it must have meant since his name was on the byline that it was a "BIG STORY."

Why he just didn't say that one of the University's big-time, expected contributors said that a downtown campus made no sense for the Complex is something I don't understand. That probably killed any chance of the Complex going downtown.

The University is a strange beast. It seems that they are not prepared to go into a financial hole in order to help out our Mayor. Gee, if the University is "cash-strapped" as Henderson claims, then the University Board should be congratulated rather than condemned for their actions.

Didn't we read something recently about universities and debt in that Star:

• "The University of Windsor has $108.8 million in debt or $7,522 per student, which is the third lowest debt-to-student ratio of the 13 universities in the study.
  
  Before June 2006, the school had $45 million in debt. It floated additional debentures to pay for the new medical school and the Centre for Engineering Innovation.
  
  "We were very careful about debt we took on," said Sandra Aversa, associate vice-president of finance. "Our debt ratios are very strong. All our debt costs are budgeted for. The university probably took a more conservative approach by establishing a (fund) to pay off the debt. We've always been fiscally prudent to ensure the long term financial future of the institution."

Hmmmm perhaps Ross Paul should run for Mayor since his term as President of the University is ending soon. We could use someone who is prudent in handling his constituents' money.

DIEFENBAKER'S "THEY" ARE BACK

I was reminded of this whenI heard an interview on CKLW involving Councillor Jones after the Ward 2 Schwartz road meeting. Here is the transcript:

• "Announcer: While most approve of the proposal, there has been some negative feedback but Ward 2 Councillor Ron Jones isn’t buying it
  
  Councillor Jones: This proposal has been something that the people have totally bought into. Once again, there are some who are here and we know why they are here. They are here to be negative as to this proposal and we know who sent them."

Dief the Chief used to sprinkle "THEY" in his speeches all the time. If it were not for the Chief, THEY would get us! He had to protect us from THEM.

Well, THEY are still around it seems but have moved to Windsor. I never had the chance to ask the former Prime Minister who THEY were but perhaps Councillor Jones could reveal their identity so I can sleep better at night.

WeACT Website Is Live Now

WHAT, YOU HAVE STILL NOT MADE YOUR DONATION TO WeACT.

Now you have no excuse for not doing so.

Just go to http://www.weact.ca/ and click on DONATE.

Now what can be simpler than that

Governments As Blockbusters

Someone at MDOT or at FHWA will have to explain it because I sure can't.

The West End politicos and activists in Sandwich will have to start asking themselves some tough questions as well. They really will have to look in the mirror one day and ask themselves if they've been played as total suckers. Perhaps Councillor Postma may have to revise her suggested Blockbuster Resolution.

No one seems to care I guess that hundreds of families and businesses will have to be moved out of Delray to make way for a new DRIC bridge. Once the final location is determined in Windsor, we'll see how Sandwich is sandwiched. When there are no Schwartz tunnels for Sandwich, who will cry for residents?

But let's not talk about our side, let's talk about the US side. The Detroit publication, Metro Times, just ran a story on the activist, John Nagy, moving out of Delray. I'll post a copy of that story below and then comment on it.

You remember John Nagy don't you. I've mentioned him in my Blogs several time. He is the guy who said about DRIC:

• "When the DRIC project first came to Delray, only a few people showed up at a meeting. He took it upon himself to inform the community of all the latest developments and the upcoming meetings. He made sure MDOT had a mailing list for Delray, and he himself went house-to-house, wrote addresses down, and submitted them to MDOT...He stressed that it is unfair to characterize the MDOT/DRIC team as a “villain.” The DRIC process always let an individual say what needs to be said.
  
  He noted that the MDOT/DRIC team has been more than open with the community."
  
  
• "But lately Nagy, a retired machine operator who's lived in the neighborhood his entire 51 years, has become excited by a proposed project he hopes will spur nascent redevelopment efforts...
  
  You'd think Nagy and other community leaders would be dead set against funneling thousands of semis spewing diesel fumes through their neighborhood every day. But the promise of development dollars has helped win them over...
  
  MDOT officials have met frequently with residents, promising to sweeten the pot if and when a bridge is built. At 23 public meetings conducted so far in southwest Detroit, agency director Kirk T. Steudle and study director Mohammed Alghurabi have sat with residents in community centers and high school gyms, answering questions and seeking input. They promised the agency would help bring housing and commercial redevelopment to the neighborhood, showing pictures of varying styles of residential buildings, cultural attractions and business projects, asking residents which would be most welcome.
  
  At first, Nagy says, he had no intention of agreeing to an international crossing running through his neighborhood. But after hearing MDOT's promises, his opinion changed.
  
  "I think, overall, the bridge is a win-win situation," he says. "It's going to do away with a lot of blight and contaminated properties."

Perhaps he finally realized what I written on here before about DRIC and the revitalization of Delray:

• "C. Bob Benson noted revitalization of the community is not MDOT’s responsibility. MDOT will make recommendations; it will be someone else’s responsibility to implement those plans. Some people may have the impression that MDOT is going to lead the revitalization of the area.
  
• R. Mohammed Alghurabi noted MDOT is responsible for the DRIC study. And MDOT will be responsible to build the new bridge, plaza and interchange, if the project is approved. He noted MDOT will need partners to revitalize Delray.
  
  
• Q. What will it take to implement the conceptual land use plan for Delray that the DRIC Study Team proposed?
  
  A. It will take a partnership among many units of government, including the City of Detroit, and the private sector. MDOT and the Federal Highway Administration can serve as a catalyst and make some but not all the investments. And, the DRIC Study Team believes it will take 20 to 25 years to fully revitalize Delray as portrayed in the conceptual land use plans."

To me it is a tragedy about how people are being used as pawns in this border matter. Take my friend in Delray as an example. She has a large house there. What's it worth, perhaps $20-30,000. Add in, say another 25%, because of the taking by MDOT and she will get slightly under $40,000 at most. Other people with smaller homes, and Nagy said that some are worth around $8,000, might be lucky to get around $10-15,000. Now tell me where are they going to move?

That's a pretty simple question... I wonder when a representative from MDOT will answer it. I wonder if MDOT has stopped showing all of the lovely artists' renditions of what Delray could become now that reality is sinking in. I know it's an academic question for us on this side of the river but I'd be curious if someone here could make a stab at answering that question as well.

We can huff and puff about saving the heritage of Sandwich but I don't see anyone trying to save the heritage of Delray from our side.

Someone needs to explain as well frankly why Sandwich should be saved and not Delray. After all wasn't the Ambassador Bridge proposal kicked out of the DRIC process because no one side of the river was supposed to be hurt more than the other.

Of course, both Sandwich and Delray could be saved if the Enhancement Project was built since it does not require any more land in either community. For some reason however, that isn't accepted as a viable solution. I can't figure this one out either.

Here's here's the magazine story. I'll have some comments about it afterwards and let you know what the significance of it is:

• "The last stink
  A community activist calls it quits in Detroit
  by Curt Guyette
  10/24/2007
  
  John Nagy has been alive for 53 years, and every one of them has been spent living in Delray. Until now. A well-known grassroots activist, Nagy has pulled up stakes, moving from his lifelong neighborhood on Detroit's southwest side to Monroe's Frenchtown Township. He's left the community where he was born and attended school, moving from the house on Bacon Street he and three brothers grew up in and continued to live in as adults. And, most importantly for those who remain behind, he's left the community he's been trying to better for decades.
  
  All that history and all the points of connection that come with it are being left behind because Nagy's finally fed up with a city he says doesn't care about the neighborhood he loves.
  
  "I hit a brick wall," he says.
  
  The breaking point came in the form of a composting facility that moved into southwest Detroit last year and received final approval from the City Council on a 5-4 vote earlier this year. Nagy and others complain that the facility produces a nauseating smell — one he can easily distinguish from the other foul odors that also plague the neighborhood, like the stink that comes from the city's wastewater treatment plant located nearby, or from the diesel fumes belched by big semis that roll through the area day and night.
  
  "C'mon," says Nagy, "let's go for a ride and I'll show you what I'm talking about."
  
  We took a similar ride back in January, when Nagy was still fighting the composting facility. On that trip he pointed out efforts by people in the community to make improvements to their homes, a new porch here, new siding there and a fresh paint job at another spot. He also pointed out the challenges, but the emphasis was on highlighting the reasons to be optimistic in a neighborhood that, at last count, had about 4,000 residents.
  
  This time out, the rose-colored glasses were gone. Around the corner from his house is the long-closed McMillan Elementary, which Nagy says was purchased a few years ago. "Look at it now," he says. "It's wide-open. There's no boards on the windows. Anyone can get in." Land around the building has been turned into a dumpsite.
  
  "I've made numerous complaints to the city about this," he says, "but nothing's been done."
  
  He makes a right-hand turn and points to a line of doors leaning against a chain-link fence enclosing a yard strewn with junk. It's another source of complaints that have gone unaddressed. "I turned that one in three years ago," says Nagy.
  
  Farther down the block he points to another house. "That guy's running a used appliance business out of there. The city just lets him do it."
  
  He turns the corner and goes down another street until he gets to a mound of trash and junk several feet high. Since the city cut back to doing bulk trash pickup once every three months, three pickup cycles have come and gone without the garbage pile getting hauled away.
  
  "It's just gotten to the point where I'm tired of fighting battles I can't win," he says before pulling in front of an abandoned, vacant house with the exterior brick gone.
  
  "I called the city's Buildings & Safety Engineering Department as the guys were actually there stripping the bricks, and they [B&SE] told me they didn't have enough inspectors to send anyone out. And the guys were right there, stealing the bricks."
  
  At the end of the tour, Nagy stops at a yard at the end of his block. It's enclosed by chain-link fence, has trees and shrubs and roses. It used to be an abandoned eyesore sitting next to one of Nagy's rental homes. He simply took control of the property, spending a few thousand dollars to landscape it before eventually acquiring it from the city. In the yard sits a large wooden sign, painted blue with gold letters that announce: "Welcome to Delray." He built the sign and planted it in the ground, he says, "Because I've always been proud to be from Delray."
  
  It is hard to calculate what it costs a community like Delray to lose a John Nagy, but his move out certainly comes with a price to be paid by those who remain.
  
  "John leaving is an incredible loss," says Lisa Goldstein, executive director of the group Southwest Detroit Environmental Vision. A frequent ally, Nagy took a lead role in assisting Goldstein's group in the battle against the composting facility.
  
  "I also understand why he came to the point where he felt like he was beating his head against he wall," says Goldstein. As with other problems in the community Nagy points out, Goldstein says it has been a struggle getting the city and state to keep odors at the compost site in check.
  
  "I'd say enforcement has been fairly minimal," observes Goldstein.
  
  As a result, Nagy feels particularly bad for his neighbors, many of whom are elderly and on fixed incomes. Unable to afford air conditioning, they have to leave their windows open on hot summer nights, when the stink is often at its worst.
  
  That kind of concern will surely be missed, says Thomas Cervenak, executive director of the nonprofit Peoples Community Services. The organization is concerned with the provision of social services to people in the area's needy neighborhoods; Nagy serves on its board of directors.
  
  "The thing about John," says Cervenak, "is that he's always clear on his agenda, which is the betterment of his community. For some activists, they are active to see what they can get out of it. Not John. All he's been interested in is to make sure his community thrived as best as possible."
  
  Nagy's departure doesn't represent a total break from his community — he intends to remain involved with Peoples Community Services and promises to remain active on other issues, but his move out raises anew a basic question about Delray today: Located as it is in an industrial zone, should it continue to be a residential area at all?
  
  "The city is trying to have its cake and eat it too," says City Council President Kenneth Cockrel Jr. Continuing to allow new industry to move into an area where residents are already shouldering more than their fair share of polluters, and at the same time selling city-owned property to new homeowners, doesn't make sense, he says.
  
  He thinks the best plan might involve relocating homeowners, but that takes money the city doesn't have. And even if a funding source were found, some residents would fight leaving.
  
  "There are folks living there who have their roots planted pretty deep, folks who are not going to go no matter what," says Cockrel.
  
  It always seemed like John Nagy would be one of those people.
  
  Until now."

What I find fascinating is that the article did not say that Mr. Nagy sold his property, just that he's moving out. Did he sell or not? If he sold, who was the buyer? Who would want to buy property in Delray if it is so bad to live there? Could the buyer only afford to buy in Delray and nowhere else in Detroit? Has Nagy instead been forced to hang onto the property waiting for DRIC to buy him out?

Interestingly, try and find a word in that article about the DRIC bridge. There isn't one. The issue is a composting facility, not a bridge with thousands of trucks over it. With all of his opposition to the Ambassador Bridge and his support of DRIC, there is nothing in there about the border issue. And Metro Times has not been shy about its opposition to the Ambassador Bridge Company.

If you were a resident of Delray and you found out that the famous community activist was leaving town, wouldn't you be concerned too? If he could go after saying that he was never going to move, why should you stay? Would you start looking for someone who would buy your property? Would you start begging MDOT to buy your house or perhaps some speculator who is looking to make a 25% profit on the price that he pays?

Here is a key line in that story:

• "Located as it [Delray] is in an industrial zone, should it continue to be a residential area at all?"

Don't you see it? Want to learn how to be a good blockbuster? One merely needs to look to Government to be educated into how to destroy communities big time. Build them up with great plans and artists' renditions, call them residents' concepts only when push comes to shove, say there is no Government money available and when a community activist pulls out hope the leaving is publicized through the media, then you know you've won!

Let's destroy Delray. It doesn't deserve to be a residential area any longer. That's what John Nagy's leaving means. If Nagy goes, it must mean the Community is doomed so everybody better go and leave the land vacant for a new bridge. The people don't matter; just the Governments' objective does.

How does the American concept of "Environmental Justice" fit in with all of this?

And if you don't think that the game is the same in Windsor, then your head is buried so far in the sand it will never come out.

Mail Call

I missed the note that you were going to send but did not. I am sure that a lot of your fellow readers would like to know what you think about the issues:

1) Ed, did you get the one by Hydro One to install a thermostat in your house so that they could turn your AC up or down, ha,

I sent it back and said that while they were at it, include my TVs as I watch too much, I also Asked them to put a notice light on the controller so that I would know enough to smile when I Went by for the small camera they installed !!!

1984, just a little late.

Anyone I spoke to threw the request in the round basket !!!

2) Just got my second bill. $4.06 worth of water used but $76.00 bill! So why the effort to conserve when it doesn't really bring down the overall cost of the bill? I would rather pay $1.50/CM and less of the various charges that I can't control and maybe then we can see some conservation.

3)Bridge Open House

It struck me like being at a good restaurant. More than once, again as I was leaving the building, I was asked questions by Bridge employees if I was favorably impressed with the display. I was, so each time they seemed to brighten a bit. I gather this PR job is considered extremely important by the Company.

I saw Susan Whelan interacting with a group looking at a model of the Plaza and Indian Road enhancements. Another woman saw me watching and quickly came to explain details to me. I remarked that the new bridge reminds me a lot of the new bridge over the Dneiper River in Kiev. These people know bridges! She immediately asked if I was Ukrainian. Explaining no, that I had been there because of my wife's relatives she told me she has seen and travelled over the very bridge I was talking about.

All of the other presenters were very capable and personable. I left favorably disposed to their presentation. As one of the men said, the meals and sleeping arrangements alone for the construction crews will lift the Windsor economy let alone the supplying of material and maybe some local hires for those qualified.

Hope they get it done.

4) Ed my friend ..... it is obvious to me sitting at my desk that Windsor no longer has a Mayor or even a local Government.

The bridge rightfully is proceeding with their initiative since they could not get anywhere with City hall. Tony Toldo call a meeting of movers and shakers and nobody from local Government is invited and nobody from the Development Commission.

Interesting since the topic for the day was economic development in Windsor. Why not invite these people .... well all they do is try to make sure nothing happens so why would you invite them?

Did you know that we have a new Mayor in Windsor .......... hooray ......... his name is Toldo. Not sure whether it is senior or junior but they are the shadow Mayor(s) and they are running the local Government. This is what these other inept politicians don't understand. They were elected to serve the people. They do not want to do this instead they prefer to play their silly games. So the citizens of Windsor do the right thing, they ignore the inept politicians and do what's right for Windsor. Three cheers for the Ambassador Bridge and the Toldo's.

5) I have some experience with Mexican workers and I have been impressed with their industriousness and general integrity. As you know I spend more time at the racetrack than most people since I am involved with horseracing in my area. The backside (the barns) of the track are staffed largely by Latinos and most of them are Mexicans. They show up on time and do their work well for minimum wages.

My son is an attorney in several outlying counties where Mexican immigrants chose to live. His experience is that Mexicans, more than most other immigrants, can be trusted to show up when they must and to pay their bills.

My stepdaughter is based (with her husband who runs a major plant) in Guadalajara. My wife and I have both spent significant time there and I have observed that, while the standards for 100% perfection on a job are a bit lower than we have in many jobs here, nevertheless, the workers are on the job and the job gets done. The "mas o menos' attitude is reflective of a slower life style and not a shirking of duty in my judgment.

They make a good contribution to a community.

6) Re: Is there good news for Windsor...one of your best

7) I read the article Gord wrote about that meeting. My hope is they can and would be able to bring more development to the city and area.

This is not a concern. These business people know how to get things done.

The stick in the mud is the city. Like you stated Ed, they can't even get a garage built. Local government and even the province is powerless to stop the job loss around here.

Let's let the people who know how, do what they do best. Invest in the community without petty hindrences.Action on all levels and from everyone is required.
Mr. Mayor and council, that includes the Bridge. Way too many years and funds have been wasted.

Get over it.

8) Good morning Ed.
So much for tourism in Windsor.

Eddie is once again side shifting the forum. Yell about something insignificant and the people will forget last week. Usual typical politics.

Besides he is really po'd because they used the bridge.

9)Hi Ed.. ... I recently retired from the Meteorological Service of Canada
(Environment Canada). I can assure you that weather in London and in Windsor is very dissimilar. Stating that London weather is representative of Windsor weather is like saying ....so is Toronto's and Peterborough's... the prime winds in the northern hemishere blow from west to east... we all learned that in grade 5 climatology.

London's weather is affected by both Lake Huron and Lake Erie and the "lake effect" winds are much different than that of Windsor. London has the notoriety of being the
thunderstorm capital of Canada because of "lake effect" ... bet you always thought that Windsor had the most thunderstorms in Canada! Windsor may be more humid and possibly hotter in the summer thus more "smog days" than London and this is a more critical factor that prevailing winds. The pollution concerns of ozone and nitrous oxides and particulate matter abound on "smog days" and are again much different than what is happening in London.

The Ministry of the Environment (provincial agency) are responsible for monitoring air quality wherein Environment Canada monitors the weather per se and issues forecasts and warnings. Environment Canada receives hourly observations from the Windsor Airport provided by a private contractor. London, on the other hand sends it's weather data from automatic sensors at the London airport which are very much prone to error. The Ministry of the Environment run by the province does monitor wind, temperature, dew points and air quality from several locations across Windsor both downtown and the west end. It would only make common sense that who/whomever was responsible for doing their due dilligence regarding weather would use this (MOE) information instead of simply stating "London's weather is representative of southwestern Ontario."

using London data would be showing less critical concerns for pollution (better air quality) than using Windsor data.... again because of the high number of "smog days" Windsor experiences than London. It certainly would cause one to question why
Windsor data was not used in the Greenlink study.

10)
1) Transit Insurance
Make business pay $10k each for transit service.
Make it a quick death for business instead of a slow one.
2) The Barn is a Heritage site. It can't be torn down without an act of Parliament. (In Windsor's case an act of Eddie and the legal beagles)
3) Tunnel Bus - Use the Bridge due to lower rates and better management. Better view too.
4) Mexican refugees. Open an authentic Mexican plaza and have the Feds fund it. Include a restaurant.
5) Get Eddie and the council better batteries for their blackberries. The ones they have seem to be selective when it comes to community projects. That way they can attend the bridge's open house. I thought that first hand info was always credible against second hand to third with a little prejudice inserted. Oh I forgot; the bridge wants to spend money, create jobs, and ENHANCE the area. Current council wants to wait, and for what I have no idea. Elected officials come and go but the bridge will be there and will continue on.

Imagine if the Mayor worked with someone, anyone??
6) Consistencey. Never heard that word to describe council. The proper term is prevailing winds. Decisions change with the wind and air pressure. But don't use Windsor as a model. Use London. They are more consistent.

Is the WUC issue dead or has something else taken its place?

That's my rant.

WeACT ReACTion

Git-R-Done.

That expression should be Windsor's new motto after THINK BIG. And not only does it apply to Windsor but also to those who are dealing with the City of Windsor.

Of course, it is about as useless as Sam's phrase is.

When it comes to screwing taxpayers however, politicians will act quickly.

It looks like the Ministry of Municipal Affairs is taking that motto to heart. How else to explain their auditor starting last Tuesday and supposedly finishing their work in several weeks. Such speed. It makes you wonder why.

I find it quite reprehensible that the Ministry is doing anything right now with WeACT's Application in front of the Ontario Municipal Board outstanding. What if WeACT wins? The application if successful means that Windsor's actions in its request to the Ministry were improper and the Minister had no jurisdiction for setting up the audit in the first place. It means it all has to be done all over again.

Naturally, WeACT anticipated that action and has made another Application to the OMB. If successful, the effect would be to put on hold the Ministry audit until such time as the OMB has made its decision.

Never fear however, the System cannot permit mere citizens to triumph. The next challenge to WeACT will be that the OMB has no jurisdiction to hear this matter in the first place.

More to come.

• "October 24, 2007
  
  To: Ontario Municipal Board
  From: Chris Schnurr
  
  RE: OMB Case No. OMB File No.:
  
  As you know, this matter involves a determination whether the Motion passed by the City of Windsor was proper. It is my position that the Motion was passed improperly and is a nullity with the result that any action by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs carried out as a result of the Motion being passed is also improper and a nullity.
  
  The Windsor Star today reported the following:
  
  WUC audit to cost $156,610
  Dave Battagello, The Windsor Star
  
  Published: Monday, October 22, 2007
  
  An auditor has been selected to investigate the financial dealings of the Windsor Utilities Commission.
  
  The process is expected to be completed in three to four weeks, according to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs.
  
  Council received a written update Monday following its request to have an audit conducted on WUC to help explain a 86-per-cent annual water rate hike and satisfy concerns expressed by many angry ratepayers.
  
  The Toronto firm Grant Thornton LLP is expected to begin the audit as soon as an introductory meeting with city staff can be arranged, according to a ministry letter included in council's package at Monday's meeting.
  
  Costs for the audit will be paid for by the city. The final price is estimated at $156,610.
  
  Mayor Eddie Francis said how the audit will be paid for will be determined by council during next month's budget deliberations.
  
  Council requested the audit on Aug. 13, approving a motion brought forward by Francis, although some residents and Coun. Alan Halberstadt, fearing the process will not go far enough, instead wanted the investigation conducted by Ontario's Auditor General.
  
  WUC officials had said the water rate hike was needed to help repair the city's crumbling watermain infrastructure.
  
  Terms of reference for the audit have also been released by the ministry. It will focus on financial analysis of WUC dating back to 2003. It will also determine how the water, wastewater and sewer rates were accounted for in both WUC's and the city's financial statements.
  
  The audit may also include examination of any books, accounts, records, receipts, funds or financial transactions relevant in the opinion of the auditor.
  
  Upon completion, a written report will be submitted to Ontario's Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
  
  Coun. Alan Halberstadt, who has been outspoken in his concerns about WUC's financial dealings, said he is happy to see issues, such as dozens of residential water meters not being hooked up and WUC's watermain replacement levy possibly not being used properly, being investigated.
  
  But said there are too many unanswered questions he feels will not be covered by the audit. He had hoped that the related utility, Enwin Utilities, would be included in the investigation.
  
  "It appears Enwin might be in the clear on this, but we don't know," he said. "Administration wasn't able to answer my questions about that, so I'm going to call (the ministry in) London.
  
  "I'm not content unless I find out if there is more substance with regards to the information." [emphasis added]
  
  Given the time period of the OMB process, it is obvious that the audit will be completed before the OMB has had the opportunity to make its determination.
  
  I wrote to the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and made the Ministry aware of my application to the OMB. Notwithstanding the application, as the OMB can tell, the Ministry has moved forward.
  
  Pursuant to its jurisdiction under sections 34-37 and 48 of the Ontario Municipal Board Act, I hereby request that the Board make an order requiring the Ministry to discontinue the audit until such time as the OMB has made its final decision. Failure to do so, makes my application meaningless since the audit will have been completed long before a final decision is made.
  
  In the circumstances, I hereby request that this action be taken forthwith.
  
  Sincerely,
  
  
  Chris Schnurr
  
  P.S. We have learned today from the Star that the auditors have have started on Tuesday to undertake the audit so that our request must be heard immediately or there is in fact is no point in even having the OMB involved.

I trust that this ReACTion supplies proof why WEACT can use your support. As I said yesterday, your donation may be paid into the WeACT Legal Fund by visiting any branch of the Royal Bank and making a deposit to Account #08152-1008275. Donations can be made anonymously too.

And if you want to help out too, email me at windsorcityblog@yahoo.ca and I will get you in touch with the people at WeACT. A couple of practising lawyers and some law students who would like to do some "pro bono" work would be a useful and welcome addition to the roster!