If anyone on Council wants help in drafting Terms of Reference for a full Inquiry into the WUC mess, I offer as a template the following excerpts from the Adscam Terms of Reference under which Justice Gomery acted. His Fact Finding Report was designed in Part 1 to determine what happened and "who was responsible." Should we expect anything less?
- TERMS OF REFERENCE
The Committee of the Privy Council, on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, advise that a Commission do issue under Part I of the Inquiries Act and under the Great Seal of Canada appointing the Honourable John Howard Gomery, a judge of the Superior Court of Quebec, as Commissioner
a. to investigate and report on questions raised, directly or indirectly, by Chapters 3 and 4 of the November 2003 Report of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons with regard to the sponsorship program and advertising activities of the Government of Canada, includingi. the creation of the sponsorship program,
ii. the selection of communications and advertising agencies,
iii. the management of the sponsorship program and advertising activities
by government officials at all levels,
iv. the receipt and use of any funds or commissions disbursed in
connection with the sponsorship program and advertising activities
by any person or organization, and
v. any other circumstance directly related to the sponsorship program
and advertising activities that the Commissioner considers relevant
to fulfilling his mandate, and
b. to make any recommendations that he considers advisable, based on the factual findings made under paragraph (a), to prevent mismanagement of sponsorship programs or advertising activities in the future ...
and the Committee do further advise that
c. pursuant to section 56 of the Judges Act, the Honourable John Howard Gomery be authorized to act as a Commissioner on the inquiry;
d. the Commissioner be directed to conduct the inquiry under the name of the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities;
e. the Commissioner be authorized to adopt any procedures and methods that he may consider expedient for the proper conduct of the inquiry, and to sit at any times and in any places in Canada that he may decide;
f. the Commissioner be authorized to grant to any person who satisfies him that he or she has a substantial and direct interest in the subjectmatter of the inquiry an opportunity during the inquiry to give evidence and to examine or cross-examine witnesses personally or by counsel on evidence relevant to the person’s interest;
g. the Commissioner be authorized to conduct consultations in relation to formulating the recommendations referred to in paragraph (b) as he sees fit...
j. the Commissioner be authorized to engage the services of any experts and other persons referred to in section 11 of the Inquiries Act, at rates of remuneration and reimbursement that may be approved by the Treasury Board;
k. the Commissioner be directed to perform his duties without expressing any conclusion or recommendation regarding the civil or criminal liability of any person or organization and to ensure that the conduct of the inquiry does not jeopardize any ongoing criminal investigation or criminal proceedings;
l. the Commissioner be directed to submit, on an urgent basis, one or more reports, interim or final, of his factual findings made pursuant to paragraph (a) in both official languages, to the Governor in Council, and to submit a separate report of his recommendations made pursuant to paragraph (b), in both official languages, to the Governor in Council;
and
m. the Commissioner be directed to file the papers and records of the inquiry with the Clerk of the Privy Council as soon as reasonably possible after the conclusion of the inquiry.
The only part that I would change is in section k. I want the Inquiry Officer to name names since suggestions have been made that certain people are the ones responsible for the mess. Let's find out who really is and what role "politics" really played.
No comments:
Post a Comment